13 replies to this topic

[Joe Bloe]

The TV News informs me that 35 people were killed on voting day (most blown up by bombs). Many voters got to the polls only to find they were not reistered and couldn't vote, and there were rumours of electoral fraud. The news reporter summarised the situation with, "The elections were confusing, violent, chaotic, but still a success!"

If that's a success, they're aiming too low.

[Ungodly]

I hope things improve for those people. They've had enough suffering as a result of the US having a moron for a President.

[deathislife]

Are you talking about Bush or Obama ? Bush ws horrible, but I thought he was abetter president then we give him credit for. And I hate Obama. The healt care thing will destroy them at the polls.

[Ungodly]

deathislife, on 10 March 2010 - 08:06 PM, said:

Are you talking about Bush or Obama ? Bush ws horrible, but I thought he was abetter president then we give him credit for. And I hate Obama. The healt care thing will destroy them at the polls.

When I use the words moron and President in the same sentence I'm certainly talking about George Warcriminal Bush. Bush failed to prevent the worst terr'ist attack on US soil in history, then started a war of imperialist aggression based on a pack of lies, ordered the use of illegal, immoral, unethical and despicable torture on prisoners of war and dragged this nation down perilously close to his own personal level of stupidity. He was certainly the worst US President in my lifetime, and that dates back to Harry Truman.

I realize Obama is not popular in some circles, but he is, at least, a very intelligent and very well educated man.

[Storybook]

Bush was the worst president of my lifetime. I'm disappointed in Obama so far...

[Ungodly]

Storybook, on 10 March 2010 - 08:58 PM, said:

Bush was the worst president of my lifetime. I'm disappointed in Obama so far...

Me too. Even Superman could not have done half of the Change we all believed in. So disappointment with Obama was a foregone conclusion right from the start.

Still, as I think you mean, I'm disappointed with how ineffective he is and how even with a clear majority the Demoncrats can't seem to stop being candy ass sissy boys and just get something done. It is perfectly obvious that the Party of Jesus will oppose everything they try to do unless it is tax cuts for the very wealthy that also somehow harm poor people or at least one minority.

If they had testicles they would just ignore the Rethuglicans, do a steamroller act and get something done for a change.

I give the US Congress a 3 on a scale of 10. They are not completely and irrevocably evil, but they sure are as useless as a free copy of the Bible. And Obama, at least he thinks he's great.

[Storybook]

Ungodly, on 11 March 2010 - 06:41 AM, said:

Still, as I think you mean, I'm disappointed with how ineffective he is and how even with a clear majority the Demoncrats can't seem to stop being candy ass sissy boys and just get something done. It is perfectly obvious that the Party of Jesus will oppose everything they try to do unless it is tax cuts for the very wealthy that also somehow harm poor people or at least one minority.

If they had testicles they would just ignore the Rethuglicans, do a steamroller act and get something done for a change.

Yes, exactly.

[deathislife]

I have to disagree. I myself am an independent, but I think that if they force this through, they'll pay during elections. I like republicians more then democrats, but that's probably just because my dad is a big supporter of the party. And Bush went to war, but the Senate/Congress voted on it, so we can't just blame him, which some people do. And Obama was not qualilified when he became president. And I still don't think he is. And Bush isn't as idiotic as people say, he's just a horrible speaker.

[Storybook]

deathislife, on 11 March 2010 - 02:51 PM, said:

Bush went to war, but the Senate/Congress voted on it, so we can't just blame him,

The senate/congress voted on it BASED ON THE LIES THAT BUSH FED THEM. So, the war was ALL Bush/Cheney's fault.

[deathislife]

Storybook, on 11 March 2010 - 06:49 PM, said:

The senate/congress voted on it BASED ON THE LIES THAT BUSH FED THEM. So, the war was ALL Bush/Cheney's fault.

Very true, but Bush got the information from the CIA. I can understand blaming Bush, but the CIA also deserve some of the blame, as they're the ones who got the faulty information.

[Ungodly]

deathislife, on 12 March 2010 - 10:09 AM, said:

Very true, but Bush got the information from the CIA. I can understand blaming Bush, but the CIA also deserve some of the blame, as they're the ones who got the faulty information.

Bush and Darth Cheney told the CIA to give them the lies they had prepared in advance before contacting the CIA to order up those lies.

They entered into a conspiracy to start a war of aggression, thereby violating Article 6 of the Nuremberg Principles and making them meet the definition of war criminals.

George Warcriminal Bush wanted to start a war with Iraq in his first month in office, long before he failed to prevent the attacks of 9/11. In his weekly security meetings he asked for reasons he could use to start a war with Iraq.

Quote

The chairman of the British Joint Intelligence Committee in 2001 told investigators Monday that elements of the Bush Administration were pushing for regime change in Iraq in early 2001, months before the 9/11 attacks and two years before President George W. Bush formally announced the Iraq war.

Sir Peter Ricketts, now-Secretary at the Foreign Office, said that US and British officials believed at the time that measures against Iraq were failing: "sanctions, an incentive to lift sanctions if Saddam allowed the United Weapons inspectors to return, and the 'no fly' zones over the north and south of the country."

Ricketts also said that US officials had raised the prospect of regime change in Iraq, asserting that the British weren't supportive of the idea at the time.

"We were conscious that there were other voices in Washington, some of whom were talking about regime change," Ricketts said.

The head of the British Foreign Office's Middle East department, Sir William Patey, told the inquiry that his office was aware of regime change talk from some parts of the Bush Administration shortly after they took office in 2001.

(source)

[deathislife]

Hmmm, interesting. So, maybe he did want it to happen, but after 9/11, he had the backing of the people of the United States. The people wanted someone to pay, and they were happy to go to Iraq. No, it wasn't the way to go about it, but they were happy about it at the time. I think...I didn't care one way or another about 9/11 when it happened.

[alteredmind]

Don't mean to go off topic but I remember when the trade towers fell. I saw it in a English or writing class on my softmore/junior year in high school, I remember it being live on the news and the people on the news were saying the plane was very odd or suspicious to be flying around the way it was. It makes sense that they were saying that since it was flying so low and in that area or restricted airspace. I was literally struck with a sense of "what the fuck" with a friend in the classroom with me while a bell from the school was ringing and people ended up running all over the place like they were in a panic or like it was the end of the world out of the class room which I later saw people running in the hallway while me and my friend were the only people in the classroom watching the news then I later was shaking my head left and right after the buildings fell. During the time I saw that, I Think I remember thinking the pilot was high on a drug(not pot) or didn't get enough sleep and that it was all a big accident(NO, I did not laugh or think that it was funny) I did think it was crazy. I think I remember kids skipping or leaving school(school was not over yet)

I don't bye the official story or the official conspiracy that the gov set up the world trade centers with explosives. If The conspiracy was true then it would be really dumb in my opinion because it would make it harder for the gov for what they would call to become victorious in a war by planning to start a war by attacking there own economy. I remember seeing in another forum that someone put it out or thought that maybe bush, the CIA and others were involved in a plot to use the bombing of the trade towers by AL Quaeda as an excuse to go to war before the towers fell while not doing anything about preventing the world trade towers from collapsing or just using it as an excuse to go to war after the trade towers fell with the propaganda that persuaded the masses to support going to war.

Edited by alteredmind, 18 March 2011 - 01:34 AM.

[Ungodly]

Science gave us skyscrapers and airplanes, religion brought them together. The attacks on 9/11 wre the work of Al Quaeda. They hate the US because we prop up the Saudi dictatorship and, as infidels, we defile their holy land.

The irony is that the attackers on 9/11 worship the same mass murdering Invisible Sky Monster as the majority of the people they killed.

When you think the most high and holy being in the universe frequently orders or directly kills thousands or millions of people whenever he has a temper tantrum, then it is easy to believe It will be happy when you kill people in its name.

Theism is the mortal enemy of decency and morality.