Jump to content

Welcome to Ain't No God
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

SCOTUS To Hear Church State Separation Case in November

- - - - - SCOTUS prayer invocation government establishment clause

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1
Ungodly

Ungodly

    Has Equal Rights

  • Administrators
  • 21,706 posts
  • LocationInland Empire, California

The Supreme Court of the US will hear arguments in November on a case involving prayers of invocation at town government meetings.  In the case at hand a Jesus industry professional offered a prayer to the specific imaginary monster named Jesus, thus specifically endorsing Christian religious myths.  Previous guidance from SCOTUS left cities and towns to make veiled references to generic Sky Monster(s) without being brand-specific.  The courts have ruled previously that endorsing a specific brand of stupid does clearly violate the Establishment Clause.

 

By praying directly to the children's cartoon character Jesus a line was crossed.

 

In the United States all government agencies must refrain from promoting delusional belief systems such as religions.  The wise men who created the foundation of our nation knew from first hand experience in Europe and the Colonies that religions historically seek to subvert and control governments in their authoritarian and conformist false world view.

 

Not content just to build a wall around themselves that keeps out knowledge of the real world, some persons afflicted with religious beliefs believe it is their duty to impose their brand of ignorance on all persons, whether welcome or not.  Our forefathers drew the line clearly, government is not to endorse religion.  It is clear that prayers of invocation at government functions spit in the eye of the First Amendment.

 

If some people wish to believe the intolerant rants of a bronze age genocidal tribe that is their mistake to make, but they are not entitled to drag the rest of society into their pit of self congratulatory ignorance.

 

Just say NO to Jeebus in government!

 

story

reference

Establishment Clause


Join our religion of love and peace or burn in hell!


#2
RIP Joe Bloe

RIP Joe Bloe

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10,061 posts
  • LocationAdelaide, South Australia

My prediction:

A period of silence will be allowed.

 

That will allow the Christians to get their foot in the door. Councillors will feel free to introduce the silence with a reminder that it could be used to offer up a prayer to the god of one's choice. The silence will remain pristine, but the preamble will make it clear to everyone that Jesus is in the room; taking part and making decisions.


Believe nothing you hear and only half what you see.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: SCOTUS, prayer, invocation, government, establishment clause

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users